Court Report

Our Guide to the Confusing World of School Choice Funding

HSLDA continues to oppose state funding for homeschooling, because we believe it will result in less homeschool freedom. The risk is that once the government starts paying for the education parents provide, the government will get the final say in what parents teach. Government money brings government control.

HSLDA President Jim Mason detailed this view in his 2018 HSLDA Magazine article, “The Civic Virtue of Private Home Education”—a warning about government control that has only become more relevant as calls for state funding have increased.[1] In the past two years alone, more than 44 states have introduced some form of government funding for school choice.[2]

Not all of these proposals touch homeschooling, and some—like private savings plans or tax credits—simply let families keep more of their own money without involving public funding—a key distinction for HSLDA. Still, the entire discussion and the dizzying array of legislation and proposals can feel overwhelming.

To help you sort through it all, here is a brief guide to some of the most common education funding methods and what they mean for homeschooling families.

Education Savings Accounts (ESAs)

An ESA is a government-funded account that allows parents to use state funds to pay for approved education expenses like private school tuition, tutoring, or curriculum materials for their child. These are often called “scholarship accounts.” West Virginia’s Hope Scholarship Program and Arizona’s Empowerment Scholarship Accounts are two examples. Because these are public programs, the money comes from taxpayers and public funds.

Some states (including West Virginia and Arizona) have created a separate category for students who participate in ESAs. While these students might consider themselves to be homeschooled, they are legally distinct from traditional homeschool students under state law. Homeschool advocates pushed for this distinction to help protect privately homeschooling families from the potential of additional regulations.

Coverdell Accounts and 529 Plans

These are privately funded savings accounts that help families set aside money for education expenses by providing them with tax benefits on the money they save. Coverdell Accounts are federally regulated, whereas 529 Plans are regulated at the state level. Originally, these accounts were designed just for college costs, but now parents can use the funds for certain K–12 expenses as well.

Unlike ESAs, parents put their own money into Coverdell Accounts and 529 Plans, rather than funds from the government. Because the money grows tax free and withdrawals for approved expenses aren’t taxed, these programs help parents save their own money more effectively for their children’s education, while also keeping more of it.

Only Wyoming doesn’t have a 529 Plan, but these plans are not restricted by residency, so you can sign up for one in another state. However, these programs have mostly been limited to private K–12 education for families with children in traditional brick-and-mortar schools. But recent legislative changes now allow parents—starting in future tax years—to use them for certain homeschool expenses in states that classify homeschooling as a form of private school.[3]

Scholarship Granting Organizations (SGOs)

An SGO is a nonprofit that collects private donations and uses them to award scholarships to help students attend private schools or pay for school expenses. States often give tax breaks to individuals or businesses that donate to SGOs. But once again, this is private money being used, not public dollars.

For example, Arizona has the Arizona School Tuition Organization. Donors receive a dollar-for-dollar credit against their Arizona state income taxes for their contributions and eligible students can qualify for a scholarship for education expenses.

Recently passed federal legislation created a new federal tax incentive for taxpayers who donate to state SGOs. Although the program won’t take effect for several years—and the treasury department hasn’t even started drafting regulations—we expect SGOs to become increasingly common in the years ahead.

Tax Credits

A tax credit directly reduces the amount of taxes you owe. Tax credits are either refundable or nonrefundable.

Nonrefundable tax credits can reduce your taxes owed to zero but stop there. For example, if you owe $200 in taxes, a nonrefundable tax credit can reduce the amount owed to $0. This helps families keep more of their own money by lowering their tax bill, enabling them to use their savings for private education expenses like tutoring or curriculum.

Some states, like Ohio, have a nonrefundable tax credit that requires parents to submit receipts showing that they spent the money on approved educational expenses. However, not all operate that way. HSLDA has written a model bill that allows parents to receive a nonrefundable tax credit without submitting itemized receipts.[4]

Refundable tax credits can reduce your total taxes owed below zero. For example, if you owe $200 in taxes and have a refundable credit worth $250, the state will pay you $50—the amount over what you owed. When this happens, the government pays you the difference in a “refund.” This type of credit combines private and public funding: Families keep their own money while also receiving additional state funds to pay for their child’s education.

In Oklahoma, homeschooling families can claim up to $1,000 per student for qualified educational expenses like curriculum and standardized test fees. If the amount of taxes a family owes is less than the amount the family paid in qualified educational expenses, the family can get a “refund” for the difference.

Tax Deductions

A tax deduction reduces the amount of income that is subject to tax, which can lower your overall tax bill. As a simplified example, if you earn $5,000 and claim a $1,000 deduction, your taxable income will drop to $4,000. This puts more money back in the pockets of parents by lowering the income that the government taxes.

As an example, Indiana allows families in private schools or homeschools to claim a $1,000 per child tax deduction on their state income taxes.[5]

Vouchers

A voucher is a government-funded certificate that parents can use to pay for tuition at a private school instead of sending their child to a public school. Like an ESA, it is public funding of a child’s education. The key difference is that with a voucher, the money goes directly to the private school, whereas with an ESA, the funds are deposited into an account that parents can use for a broader range of educational expenses.

Vouchers generally cover tuition at approved private schools, excluding homeschooling. However, some private schools design programs where students receive the school’s curriculum but complete their learning at home, sometimes with parent instruction. In these cases, the students are legally classified as private school students—even though their day-today education resembles homeschooling. Wisconsin has a large private school that structures its voucher program this way. state funding Accepting “ doesn’t just bring additional regulation—it subtly shifts responsibility for education from parents to the state.

Public vs. Privately Funded Education

In the end, not all education funding ideas are created equal. Some—like private savings accounts or tax deductions—simply let families keep more of their own money. Others—like ESAs or vouchers—bring public dollars into the mix and can open the door to additional government oversight. Understanding these differences can help homeschooling families, voters, and lawmakers support policies that expand educational freedom without compromising the independence that makes homeschooling thrive.

At HSLDA, we believe that homeschooling works because it lets families shape learning around a child’s unique needs. But that success depends on parents retaining flexibility and authority over their child’s education. Maintaining that authority isn’t just about daily decisions. It reflects that parents are ultimately responsible for their child’s education. Public funding threatens both. As Mason put it in his article, “Taxfunded ESAs are premised on the notion that the education of children is primarily a state responsibility based on the interests of the state.”

Accepting state funding doesn’t just bring additional regulation—it subtly shifts responsibility for education from parents to the state, opening the door for more oversight and regulation. Keeping homeschooling independent ensures families retain both authority and responsibility for their children’s learning.

HSLDA opposes public funding for homeschooling as a policy matter, for what we perceive as the long-term risks it brings. But we would never judge a family for the choices they make in the best interests of their children.

Amy is an attorney and homeschool graduate who helps HSLDA member families resolve legal difficulties related to homeschooling in 11 states.

Get the latest news, stories, and events!

You’ll receive weekly updates & breaking news alerts. We make it easy to unsubscribe.

Want to stay in-the-loop?

Get your state legal updates and homeschool news sent straight to your inbox. Sign up for free today!
No, I'm okay.
You’ll receive weekly updates & breaking news alerts. We make it easy to unsubscribe.