We back initiatives that encourage philanthropy aimed at helping homeschoolers—such as government incentives for companies
that contribute to scholarship funds. And
thanks to generous donors, HSLDA has
been able to give away over $15 million in
Compassion Grants to individual families
and groups.
However, we are convinced that ESAs
and other tax-funded accounts will provide
government officials with a reason to further
regulate and oversee homeschooling.
The argument for enacting new restrictions could go (and has gone) something like
this: Now that homeschooling families are
receiving government money, the government
needs to ensure they are spending that money
responsibly.
On those grounds, they could enact regulations and restrictions that could reverse the
trend toward homeschool freedom that has
been achieved in recent decades.
We’re already seeing this happen in a very
public way. Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs
lamented her state’s status as the first to establish ESAs for all families. Hobbs insisted that
the funding program “lacks accountability and
will likely bankrupt this state.”
The slew of education funding laws enacted
this year has opened many doors to cries for
further regulation. More on that below.
Victory and defeat:
ESA bills in 2023
First, let’s look at what happened with education funding in some key states in 2023.
>> Arkansas and Utah established ESAs that
are available to all students, regardless of the
type of schooling they choose.
>> Iowa and Florida created programs that provide funding for private
school students, but not homeschool
students. In Florida, students can be
educated at home under an ESA, but
this is now a different legal category than
that of a home education program. (Thanks in
large part to homeschool advocates.)
>> Virginia, Idaho, Missouri, and Maine also
moved to establish ESAs that would have been
available to all students, regardless of the type
of schooling they choose. But homeschool
advocates opposed the bills, and they didn’t
pass.
>> Oklahoma created a new tax credit
for families whose children attend private
school or are homeschooled. HSLDA has long
supported tax credits for homeschooling,
but Oklahoma’s measure stirred controversy within the state because its tax credit is
refundable. That’s because if the credit reduces a family’s tax burden below zero, the family
would receive the remainder of the credit as
a cash payment from the government. In this
circumstance, the money goes beyond a tax
break to direct payments, which could open
the door to more regulation.
>> In October, North Carolina passed legislation as part of the state budget bill that
greatly expands the Opportunity Scholarship.
This program provides funds that families
may spend on private school tuition, transportation, equipment, and related expenses
from kindergarten through 12th grade. The
new law removes the income cap for families
to receive the scholarship, though the amount
that families receive still varies according to
income. The program is not open to homeschool families.
>> A few other states, including Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas, were considering various
types of funding for school choice late in 2023.
ESAs before 2023
Several other states already had ESA programs on the books, and some of them already
place special requirements on homeschooling
families who participate.
>> Indiana, Mississippi, Montana, South
Carolina, and Tennessee restrict their ESAs
to certain categories of participants, including students with special needs, families with limited income, or both. Many of them also
require students to have individualized education programs, which are obtained through
the public school system. These programs
are not really intended for homeschooling
families.
>> North Carolina’s ESA for students with
disabilities remains unchanged. Homeschooling families may apply for funds through this
program, but they must first work with the
public school system to obtain an individualized education program for their students.
>> New Hampshire established an ESA
program in 2021. Families must meet certain
income thresholds when they first apply,
and they must operate under a separate
statute from the state’s homeschool law. This
means they have to meet a few extra requirements not imposed on other homeschooling
families.
Is the backlash to homeschooling
beginning?
We’re already seeing movement across
states with new ESA measures to further
regulate homeschooling. Let’s get back
to our examples. Consider the following
developments:
>> In New Hampshire, a state senator introduced legislation that would have required
students to attend public school for at least a
year before applying to receive ESA funding.
Some advocates saw the move as an attempt
to undermine private and homeschool education, which the state senator called “siloed and
unregulated institutions of indoctrination.”
The bill died before any action by HSLDA’s
members was needed.
>> The day after Arkansas enacted its ESA
program, a state representative introduced a
bill that would have required all homeschooling
families to test their children annually (if they
accepted state funding). HSLDA tracked the
bill, which died before any action was needed.
It’s also noteworthy that the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette suggested that if homeschoolers
in their state accept government funds, they
should be required to take the same standardized tests that public school students take—at
the same time, and possibly at the same
facilities.
>> In Florida, an earlier version of the 2023
school choice bill proposed granting government funds to homeschooling families
only under certain conditions. The enacted
version provides funds to homeschoolers,
but only if they are willing to put themselves
in a separate legal category from traditional
homeschoolers.
The earlier version’s conditions included
making homeschoolers meet with choice navigators—private or professional individuals
who would become quasi-government actors.
They would be tasked with advising parents
regarding education decisions and providing
an independent opinion when it came time
to evaluate students. The navigators would
also be empowered to affirm or reject a
parent’s assessment of their student’s performance. The navigators were also supposed
to send standardized test scores of all homeschool students to researchers at Florida
State University.
All of these conditions would have diminished the freedom of homeschooling parents
to personalize their child’s education according to individual needs.
Freedom is the best policy
To reiterate: Over the past 40 years, as HSLDA
has worked with hundreds of thousands of
homeschooling families, we have observed
that removing barriers has helped children and
families thrive. We are concerned that government funds for homeschooling will be followed
by restrictions that threaten the principles that
make homeschooling successful.
Foremost among these principles is
freedom.
Parents know their children best and have
the greatest interest in seeing them succeed. It
stands to reason that homeschooling parents
should enjoy the greatest possible freedom to
craft personalized programs designed to meet
the needs and interests of their individual
students.
This flexibility empowers parents to innovate in ways that help their children thrive.
For example, one Virginia family homeschooled their son after he was diagnosed
with an immune system disorder. Their focus
on outdoor learning not only helped him
overcome his health struggles but inspired
him to pursue international adventures such
as climbing Mount Kilimanjaro. He’s now
studying for a career in forestry.
Homeschooling allows parents to accommodate students who learn differently and
at different speeds. We recently featured the
story of a New Mexico student who finished school early to launch a professional career
at age 17. We also helped a Kentucky family
whose teen is taking a little longer to graduate to ensure he’ll be ready for his chosen
vocation—repairing cars and trucks,
particularly antiques.
Families who homeschool are also
able to band together to share resources and offer mutual support. Earlier
this year, for example, HSLDA took part
in a new conference aimed at meeting
the specific needs of Black homeschoolers
in the Atlanta area.
Motivated by love
Homeschooling has been helping children
flourish for decades—not because of government intervention, but in spite of it.
“The struggle for homeschool freedom has
been one of rolling back needless government
intrusion, not one of seeking government
help,” HSLDA President Jim Mason said in a
2016 essay titled “The Civic Virtue of Home
Education.”
For this very reason, Mason added, homeschoolers should look at government funding programs—and their inevitable rules for how this taxpayer-generated money may be
accessed and spent—as a hindrance rather
than a help.
“There is something truly lovely,” he said, “in
seeing how a free people have built a radical
counterculture, motivated by nothing less than
the love of their own children, mandated by
nothing more than their own conscience, and
supported by nothing more than their own
ingenuity and community.”
Key Terms
Public funding for school choice
Any kind of program
that provides public money to help families pay for private
school or homeschool expenses.
Education Savings Accounts
A program that provides government money to families (up to a certain amount) to spend on educational expenses. Unlike Health Savings Accounts, which are tax
shelters where individuals can place a certain amount of their own
money, ESAs are government funds deposited into an account that
parents can use for educational expenses.
Education Tax Credits
A tax credit is an amount that you subtract
from the tax you owe—in other words, keeping more of your own
money. (Not all tax credit bills are created equally and we evaluate
them on a case-by-case basis.)
Refundable Tax Credits
This version allows families to request
a cash payment from the government if the credit reduces the
amount of income tax they owe to below zero.