House Bill 4753: An Act Relative to High School Dropouts


Last Updated: June 22, 2010
House Bill 4753: An Act Relative to High School Dropouts
Joint Committee on Education

If passed, this bill would raise the maximum age of compulsory school attendance in Massachusetts from 16 to 18. The bill would also remove the current exemption from school attendance for 14-16 year olds who are employed.

HSLDA's Position:

Oppose. This bill would impose increased government control over children and further restrict parents’ rights to direct the upbringing and education of their children. These are rights that have been recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court as fundamental constitutional rights. This bill would subject students (including homeschool students) to compulsory attendance laws for an additional two years. Many homeschool families graduate their children from homeschool programs to enroll them in college or apprenticeship programs. Today, parents have the authority to determine whether their children continue in formal secondary education after the age of 16; this right must be preserved.

Action Requested:
None at this time

6/14/2010     New draft of SB 245, SB 270, HB 355, and HB 363 reported from the Joint Committee on Education
6/14/2010     Reported favorably by the committee and referred to the House Committee On Ways and Means
This bill is dead.


1. Statistics show that raising the compulsory attendance age will not reduce the dropout rate. In fact, three out of the top five states with the highest high school completion rates, Iowa (86.6%), Vermont (86.5%), and North Dakota (86.3%), compel attendance only to age 16. The state with the lowest completion rate (Nevada: 55.8%) compels attendance to age 18. (Figures are based on average freshman graduation rates: 2004-05 school year.)

2. The majority of states require attendance only to age 16. Older children unwilling to learn can cause classroom disruptions and even violence, making learning harder for their classmates who truly want to learn.

3. Passing this bill would restrict parents’ freedom to decide if their 16-year-old is ready for college or the workforce. (Some 16-year-olds who are not academically inclined benefit more from valuable work experience than from being forced to sit in a classroom).

4. Another significant impact of expanding the compulsory attendance age is an inevitable tax burden to pay for more classroom space and teachers to accommodate the additional students compelled to attend public schools. When California raised the age of compulsory attendance, unwilling students were so disruptive that new schools had to be built just to handle them and their behavior problems, all at the expense of the taxpayer.

5. A study by Cornell University on raising the age of compulsory attendance found that there was no correlation between passing a law to raise the age of compulsory attendance and high school completion rates. The study shows that specific programs targeting at risk youth can help improve completion rates, but a law raising the age of attendance does not. To view the report click here.

For more information, please see our Issues Library page on compulsory attendance age legislation.

 Other Resources

Bill Text

Bill History

Raise the Bar, Not the Age: Why raising the compulsory school age won't reduce dropout rates.