Issues Library—Federal Education Policy

Early Education


What is Early Education?

Early education is a movement that is generally thought to have begun with the Department of Health and Human Services’ introduction of the Head Start Program in 1965. This program, and others that have followed it, were premised on the idea that children kindergarten age and younger who receive a formal education perform better academically throughout their lives. While Head Start did not mandate that all children from birth to kindergarten attend school, it began a series of initiatives (one of them being funding for universal kindergarten) designed to bring children out of the home and into an institutionalized classroom environment at an earlier age.

What are Current Early Education Programs?

Following up on his 2008 campaign promise to help states implement federally funded and regulated universal early education programs,1 President Obama’s 2009 Plan for Education Overhaul as well as the 2009 Department of Education budget contained recommendations for universal preschool. Various bills before the House and Senate, such as S. 206, the Early Education Act of 2009 (introduced by Senator Barbara Boxer) proposed a federal program for early education that begins before kindergarten. Some of the more radical proposals include recommendations that federal officials “educate” parents as to the right way to raise their children from birth to age 5. Others urge children to be put in institutionalized classroom environments from birth. Some states, such as California, Georgia, and Oklahoma, have implemented universal early education pilot programs. Continuing the trend, the administration has submitted a draft FY 2011 budget that adds $9.3 billion for a new federal preschool program.2

What are the Problems with Early Institutionalized Education?

These programs are problematic both philosophically and practically. At root, they assume that a government-run school district can better raise children than can their own parents.

1. This violates the fundamental right parents have to direct their own children’s education. This right is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and was upheld by the Supreme Court in Pierce v. Society of Sisters (268 U.S. 510 1925); Wisconsin v. Yoder (406 U.S. 205 at 233); and Troxel v. Granville (530 U.S. 57 2000).

2. The notion that parents are not adequate teachers and mentors for their children is empirically untrue. As found in a large study in the United Kingdom, children who are raised (especially at early ages) in their own homes by their own mothers and fathers fare significantly better developmentally than those placed in institutional environments at an early age.3

3. Non-experimental studies of Head Start and experimental studies of statewide early education programs show little to no gain at best to early education programs. A massive six-year study of 35,000 children by Durham University shows that children enrolled in early education programs have no developmental advantage over their peers who did not enroll in any schooling before they enter primary school.4 A 2007 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development study found that children enrolled in day care were more likely to exhibit problematic behaviors, such as bullying and aggression, for several years afterwards.5 An Education Next study on the universalized kindergarten found that the long-term effects of this 60s and 70s program are negligible at best, with slightly lower dropout rates for upper-middle class children, and no positive impact on other children.6 Finally, when reviewing the early education pilot programs in Oklahoma and Georgia, the Heritage Foundation determined that despite high state spending, “neither state has experience significant sustained improvement in students’ academic achievement as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress.”7

Where Does HSLDA Stand?

HSLDA believes that parents should have the freedom to direct the education of their children at all ages, and continues to fight for this freedom in both the legal and legislative arenas. HSLDA is concerned with attempts by state legislators to lower compulsory school attendance age. HSLDA fundamentally opposes legislation implementing universal preschool because even voluntary universal early education programs can easily be pressured on families, or even become mandatory.

Notes

1. Obama-Biden campaign Web site, “Education>,” at http://www.barackobama.com/issues/Education>/ (May 6, 2009).

2. Sarah Torre, “Federal Preschool Programs Waste Taxpayers’ Money, Limit School Choice,” Heritage Foundation, March 11, 2010, http://blog.heritage.org/?p=28581.

3. Yvonne Roberts, “Official: Babies do Best with Mother,” The Guardian: Observer, October 2, 2005, http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2005/oct/02/childrensservices.familyandrelationships.

4. John Henry Westen, “Massive Study Finds Preschool and Early Childhood Initiatives Show No Benefits,” Life Site News, August 31, 2007, http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/aug/070831.htm.

5. “Early Child Care Linked to Increases in Vocabulary, Some Problem Behaviors in Fifth and Sixth Grades.” National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). NIH News. 26 March 2007. http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/mar2007/nichd-26.htm

6. Elizabeth Cascio, “What Happened When Kindergarten Went Universal?” Education Next, Spring 2010, Vol. 10 No. 2, http://educationnext.org/what-happened-when-kindergarten-went-universal/.

7. Lindsey Burke, “Does Universal Preschool Improve Learning? Lessons from Georgia and Oklahoma,” Heritage Foundation, May 14, 2009, http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2009/05/Does-Universal-Preschool-Improve-Learning-Lessons-from-Georgia-and-Oklahoma.

 Related HSLDA Articles
RSS


No Lasting Gains from Early Education or Preschool
April 18, 2013


Obama Proposes Universal Preschool for 4-Year-Olds
April 16, 2013


Federal Government Threatens Parental Rights with Early Learning Challenge
October 24, 2011


Head Start to Nowhere?
February 3, 2010


Smother Mother Strikes Again: Why Government Should Stay out of Pre-K
September 1, 2008


No Benefit to Compulsory Early Education
February 4, 2008


Numerical Comparison of Compulsory Attendance and Drop Out Rates
(Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader)


Child and Family Protection Association on Institutionalized Early Childhood Education and Development
May 2007 (Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader)


Sample Letter to City Councilman on Mandatory Preschooling
July 17, 2002


Washington Times: Compulsory Threats to Education, Freedom
April 17, 2001
 Archives
RSS


Memo to D.C. Council on Mandatory Preschool
July 18, 2002


Letter to a City Council Member on Mandatory Preschool
July 18, 2002


2001 Education Spending Comparison
August 6, 2001


President Bush Releases Blueprint For Education Reform
January 24, 2001


Court Report: Elementary and Secondary Education Act
May/June 2000


HSLDA’s Proposed Amendments to the 2000 Elementary and Secondary Education Act
March 29, 2000


Court Report: Tracking Legislation in 2000
March/April 2000

 Helpful Reading from Outside Sources
RSS


Cato Institute Policy Analysis
August 3, 2009 (Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader)


The Heritage Foundation: Does Universal Preschool Improve Learning? Lessons from Georgia and Oklahoma
May 14, 2009


The Heritage Foundation on No Child Left Behind
January 7, 2009


The Department of Education’s Impact Study
November 2008 (Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader)